Education as Tazkia: Is a child like a clean slate?
In the academic circles, one often hears the view of a child as “clean slate”, meaning there is nothing written on the slate, and unless we make sure that we write something “good”, as quickly as possible, others may spoil it by writing on it something which is “not good”. There are several renowned scholars in the Muslim world who have adopted the “clean slate” view of the child from the West without the necessary critical evaluation.
This “clean slate” assumption about the child seems in serious contradiction to (i) the assertion in Quran “luqad khalaqnal insaan a fi ahsun i taqveem” [Sura Teen], (ii) the concept of tazkia in Islam, implying that the child comes to this world in a pristine and the best of the form and the dunya spoils it, and (iii) at the time of creation “He taught Adam all the names of everything.” (Quran 2:31) lest they can not claim during akhirah that knowledge did not come to them.
Please note that this “clean slate” assumption of the child as it is understood today has origins from the West [See for example Problems with Bloom’s Taxonomy] and has some far reaching consequences on the resulting educational system as explained below.
The goal of education is the success here and in the hereafter. However, success requires purification of the soul. “In Islam, the ultimate objective of religion and shariah (Islamic law) and the real purpose of raising prophets from among mankind was performing and teaching tazkiah.[2]“. “The goal of tazkiya is to return to one’s beginning i.e. as a new-born child, pure and innocent, free from malice, self-conceit and pride. The dunya, however, makes a person’s heart hard and ‘rusty’ and the purpose of tazkiya is to polish the heart and return it to its original state.” [3]
 |
The view of a child as a “clean slate” is like considering a child as an “empty glass”. This view creates the following imperatives for the educational system:
- Unless the slate is written upon, it will remain clean. There is a danger that someone else will come and write on it something that is not desired. Unless the glass is filled, it will remain empty. There is a danger that someoneelse may come and fill it with some undesired fluid which may be poison or acid.
- It is the duty of the “state authorities” to write on the clean slate (or to fill the glass). Left alone, the child will become a threat to the law and order.
- A child is passive like a clean slate and not an active agency. There is no potential in the child to observe the signs, reflect and seek out the truth and discover the meaning of life. The child has no purpose, has no inherent impulse and drive towards growth and discovery of his relationship with nature.
- The material of this clean slate is inert and its quality (read intelligence) is randomly distributed in a bell-curve i.e. people with very high intelligence and very low intelligence are few, while people with moderate intelligence are in majority. Please see bell-curve assumption about the distribution of intelligence of students
- A child is a resouce, a “human resource” just like land, capital and machinery that needs to be put to the service of the global capitalist machinery. Therefore, schools have the responsibility to make the child malleable enough for becoming a cog in the machinery. School’s success is measured in terms of its ability to prepare the “workers” of this machinery. See for instance the criteria for world ranking of educational institutions. An institution’s rating goes down if its graduates are not employed and are not drawing higher salaries.
A better analogy than the “clean-slate” may be that of a seed. Whereas a slate is life-less, the seed represents life and an active agency. A seed has the potential to become a tree and then that tree has the potential to become a forest. The potential is pre-programmed. The responsibility of the environment is to provide nourishment and nurture it. Similarly, the responsibilty of the education is to provide an enviornment suitable for the growth of a seed. The environment necessary for the growth of a grape seed is different from that of a mango seed which is different from any other seed. One-size-fits-all standardized environment is not suitable for the diversity and growth of different potentials inherent in different types of seeds.
Unlike a seed, however, a child’s potential may or may not be visible even to experts. Each child as he grows has to find his own unique way of realizing the potential and fulfilling the responsibility for which he was sent to the world. Hence the difficulty and the problems inherent in designing a standardized system that is one-size-fits-all system that wants everyone to be exactly like the other.
See also:
- How to define success of a school or a student
- Iqbal’s view on What is Meant to be Educated
- Bell-curve assumption about the distribution of intelligence of students
- Charter of Children’s Recognition
- How Maths is Made More Difficult
- Beauty is our Business: Dijkstra and Mathematics
- Holistic Learning and Whole Life Orientation
Also check this news item what babies know might freak you out
[1] This blog was triggered by the keynote speech of Mr. Zaid Scheik of www.matrix.com.pk and wisdomhouseschool.net/ at the Robotics for Beginners Workshop at L2L Academy on July 21, 2013.
[2] Amin Ahsan Islahi, Tadabbur-r-Qur’an: Tafsir of Surah Al-Fatiha and Surah Al-Baqara
[3] Shaykh Abu Yusuf Riyadh ul Haq as quoted in a blog.
Leave a Reply