Covey’s 7 Habits of Highly Effective People
Baba Rehmatay’s Focus on Circle of Control: Reactive Focus
Currently, Baba Rehmatay seemed to be caught in the reactive focus. His behavior and irritation which is evident from his instinctive snap judgments indicate that he is not living in his circle of influence and control. His irritation indicates that despite his best efforts, the outcomes he expected are not materializing. The fundamental reason as per Covey is that he has not focused on his sphere of influence and control. His primary mandate is speedy dispensation of justice for around 1.8 million cases pending in the courts (justice delayed is justice denied). Had he focused on their fast and speedy disposal, he would have initiated a massive change management project in the operations of courts. The process outcomes should have resulted in a marked speedup of judgments within a few months. The speed of justice in itself would have instilled fear in the hearts of corrupt and many of the problems that he is trying to focus, which are in his area of concern, would have been solved.
However, instead of focusing on his circle of influence and control (i.e. the courts), he started using sou-motto powers to focus on issues lying in his circle of concern. There is no doubt that there are zillions of issues in Pakistan that need addressing and need addressing urgently, such as sugarcane prices, water quality, drugs control, garbage disposal, unhealthy salts, adulterated food, schools, universities, medical colleges etc. Wielding the raw sword of sou-motto, Baba Rehmatay is stretching his jurisdiction to bring those issues under his control which are typically the focus of executive. However, large organizations and institutions, especially the government, can not be changed overnight through snap sou-motto judgments. CJP can not improve the standards of schools, universities and medical colleges through his judgments. Only school/university authorities can do that, and only if they do that systematically and willingly through a motivational buy-in. And getting to that is a long term process. The more he tries to focus in the circle of concern, the more he becomes political and controversial. People are now openly asking him to become chief executive by imposing judicial martial law. See references to his sou-motto judgments in Baba Rehmatay: From Chief Justice to Chief Executive?
Focusing on Circle of Concern is like Tilting at the Windmills
Ignoring the circle of influence and control makes his attempts to address the myriad of issues in his circle of concern, resemble more like “tilting at the windmills” by Cervantes’ Don Quixote. Each wing of the windmill representing some of the zillion issues, with DoN Quixote’s raw sword of sou-motto aided by the lure of likely “beneficial” consequences, often called a “great right” (Justice Khosa) or Doctrine of Necessity (CJ Munir).
|Focusing on Circle of Concern without Mastering the Circle of Influence
Why CJP could not expedite the speed of court judgments?
In his interview with Javed Chaudhry (Daily Express March 22, 2018), CJP lamented on his inability to expedite the speed of court judgments. The excerpt is given below.
Change Management Expertise Required for Speeding up Justice in Pakistan.
From my 23 years experience in change management in teaching, execution and bringing about change in organizations and people through leadership, and empathizing with his apparent despair in improving the speed of court cases, I can safely say that:
1. Baba Rehmatay needs experience of “change management” and exposure of a course in change management, especially of large complex organizations such as the government machinery.
2. By his own admission, Baba Rehmatay has failed in bringing about substantial change (increase) in the speed of case disposal by HC. Simple reason is that he is a judge (and hence judgmental) and he is not a change manager. The two roles (judge and change manager) require skills and attitude that are antithesis of each other and he needs to appreciate the difference, if he has to succeed.
If (1) and (2) are true, then he will soon realize that he has been instrumental in destroying the Constitution like CJP Munir and his impatience. His dream to be remembered as Justice AR Cornelius or Justice Hamoodur Rehman as in the above interview, can safely be predicted to be turning into a nightmare.
- Constitutional Solution to Curb Horsetrading in Pakistan
- How Neocolonialism Keeps Developing Countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan Perpetually Destabilized
- What Options Gen Musharraf had after 9-11 when US threatened to send Pakistan to stone age?
- Is Justice Munir’s Doctrine of Necessity Dead or Alive?
- Narratives Designed to Dishonor Popular Choice and Support Neo-Colonialism
- Why Dictator Generals are Weaker than Civilians Rulers in Withstanding External Pressure
- Doctrine of Necessity from CJ Munir to Judge Khosa: Role of Judiciary in the Service of Neocolonialism
- SC Judgement as Project Assignment for Finance Accounting Students: SC Disqualifies PM on not Declaring Uncollected Receivables as Income
- SC Interpretation of Sadiq and Ameen in Disqualification of PM Nawaz Sharif
- SC Panama Case Judgement and Crowds Clamoring for the Heads of Rich under Robespierre
- Essential Law for Masses: Perry Mason and my Learning
- Role of Sharifuddin Pirzada in Promulgating Martial Laws for Every Dictator of Pakistan
- Why Dictatorships are Weaker in Accountability than Constitutional Governments
- Importance of Literature in Law: A Case Study of the Panama Case Supreme Court Judgement
- At What Cost! Why Compute Economic Costs of Faulty Political Decisions
- Who has Greater Will and Resolve in controlling Karachi Disturbances: Dictators vs Civilian Governments
- Traitor/Foreign Agent Production Factory of Pakistan
- Field Marshals of Pakistan: Costs of Sycophancy and Political Expediency
- Costs of Justice Munir’s Doctrine of Necessity: 4 Martial Laws and 35 years of dictatorships
- Costs of Military Dictatorships of Pakistan
- Costs of General Musharraf’s Dictatorship
- Costs of General Ayub’s Dicatatorship
- Why Pakistani Democracies are a Sham? Costs of Controlling a Democracy from Outside
- Costs of General Zia’s Dictatorship in Pakistan
- Costs of Sham Democracratic Governments in Pakistan
- Remembering East Pakistan: We look before and after, And pine for what is not
- At What Cost! Fazle Hasan of IBA and our Computation of Economic Costs